Taxing The Rich Is Not Enough

Taxing The Rich Is Not Enough
News
Like Us On Facebook
Like Us On Facebook

Is it worth it to tax the rich?  Yes…and no. I don’t hold this view just because it’s the belief of the Wall Street Journal. Taxing anyone at a higher rate will tend to bring in a little more revenue (assuming employment and GDP levels hold tight or improve).

If anybody can pay an extra 3-5%, it makes sense that it would be those of us a little better off. However, the revenue gains are so menial, that a deal in Congress that lacks these hikes is not worth blocking for the sake of politics and promises.

Indeed, President Obama’s promise should have simply been to improve the economy. However, his base largely responds to the demonization and higher taxation of the rich. Now, political promises are threatening the system over something that is not really worth it. If you can get it into a bill, great. If not, it’s not worth the small gains, and it’s not worth the economic risks to hold up a deal.

First, why we might consider raising taxes on the rich:  Extra $90B a year, a generous estimate by Bill O’Reilly in the “Rumble in the Air Conditioned Auditorium”.  Over ten years that’s $900B.  Not much when you compare it to projected government spending. But, hey, it’s something.

Now, why taxing the rich does not deserve to be a “staple”, a point on which one party refuses to budge:  1) It only brings in $90B a year.  By 2020 the debt is projected to be$ 20,000,000,000,000 ($20T).  Taxing the rich brings that to 19,370,000,000,000. 2)  Concerns of inflation.  3)  Holding up a bill for this political talking point can do serious damage to the economy.

This will hurt employment which will mean fewer people paying taxes, fewer products being made, and less revenue altogether for the government, which I’m sure will be increasing spending to “stimulate” the economy yet again.

I think Time™ Magazine said it best when referring to the tax hikes: “It’s highly likely that the amount would barely put a dent in the nation’s debt picture – akin to sending the best pitcher in this week’s Little League World Series up to St. Louis tonight to face Albert Pujols, Matt Holliday, and the rest of the Cardinal’s line-up.”  I liked that analogy, but I put it this way.  I think it’d be like going to the world’s most celebrated restaurant with Warren Buffet and picking up the tab “for him”.  Pretty laughable.

Interesting to note that Buffet, famed investor and supporter of tax-the-rich policies, could donate his net worth to the U.S. government and that machine would eat up his entire $47B fortune in about 12 days.

U.S. debt is growing and accelerating. The deficits are widening and there is very little the nation’s millionaires can do to solve that problem.  Well, little they can do on their own. But if they spend and borrow to build businesses and hire employees, we’ll have more people making more taxable incomes which means higher revenues for the government.

Increases in employment will be followed by increases in consumer spending, which means increases in sales tax. Real estate values rise, which means higher revenues for property taxes and more taxable properties. Maybe once times are better, the economic outlook a little more certain, and employment a little more steady…maybe then we can seek a little more revenue from fat cats living the high life. But for now, we need more taxable salaries, not higher taxes on a few salaries.

Most people up on the issue have heard the inflation argument.  While it’s too complicated for the scope of this article, a message from the CBO will suffice:

“The full extension of the tax cuts through 2012 would increase GDP and employment more in 2011 and 2012 than would the partial extension through 2012 because it would have a greater overall impact on after-tax income.

However, the economic impact per dollar of revenue reduction from the full extension would be smaller than that from partial extension because a greater proportion of the tax savings from the full extension would go to relatively high-income households, which tend to spend less of an increase in income than lower-income households do.”

As a final thought, I’d like to propose the idea of pegging tax brackets to cost of living. Obama is a big fan of labeling families with over $250,000 in income as “rich”.  But for families in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, etc., $250,000 gets you a small apartment and hopefully a good public school.

Now is not the time for petty games and promises that only promise political gain. Now is the time for everyone to pull together, get back to work, and contribute to the public services that we all use. If we go “off the cliff”, the rich won’t be able to solve our problems, no matter how much they’re taxed.

Tyler McDermot | Elite.

Share Tweet
React
Like Us On Facebook
Like Us On Facebook

Contributing Writer

Elite Daily is a medium for people tired of disingenuous content; we have sought to create a space where stimulating, applicable content can reach a like-minded audience.

More In News

Technology Alexia LaFata

New Roofie-Detecting Device Looks To End Date Rape Once And For All

Women everywhere are told to watch their drinks at parties and clubs. Leaving one’s drink unattended increases risks of sexual assault, especially with date rape drugs lurking around too many corners. But could a new device actually prevent date rape from happening? The pd.id, created by Canadian technical entrepreneur David Wilson, is a tiny, portable device that, if […]

World Ashley Greco-Stoner

Why The MH17 Tragic Flight Might Cause World War III

To say that 2014 has been a harrowing year for Eastern Europe would be an understatement. A war has been raging for months now between the Ukrainian military and Russian-backed separatists, and while the world has been watching and expressing its outrage, it wasn’t until last week that the conflict directly impacted other countries. The […]

Also On Elite

Humor

You’re Not Going To Watch This Entire Video, I Guarantee It

This video isn’t funny. There is no punchline. You probably think I’m telling you this as a joke. I assure you I am not. You’ll probably be left horribly disappointed after watching it and immediately find a video of a cat doing something poorly to try and recover. The title for this three minute video […]

Women

This Hollywood Actress Says She’s Never Relied On Her Looks For Her Success

The obviously beautiful Anna Kendrick revealed in an honest interview in Glamour’s August 2014 issue that her appearance has never been her “moneymaker.” Kendrick, 28, says she never relies on her looks for her career: I’m fine being small. I’m fine being all the things I am. And I’m happy I’m not supposed to be […]

Ladies

23 Qualities You Should Look For In The Perfect Jewish Husband

A short while ago, Elite Daily brought you the 40 Things Jewish Girls Can’t Live Without. Today, a detailed exploration of what should be number one on the list: a Jewish husband. You’ve been planning the wedding since you were four, and your mom’s been preparing a shidduch since before you were a fetus. He’s […]